A nice appearing, white, 1964 Hawk just sold at the Mecum Las Vegas auction for $27K. They even mentioned that it was a Studebaker 289.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
'64 Hawk at Mecum
Collapse
X
-
Thanks! I only caught part of the broadcast and missed that.
Nice looking car: https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...-turismo-hawk/
Found these on the Mecum site, also from the auction yesterday. It does not show what the sold cars went for.
- 52 Commander: https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...-state-series/
- 51 2R5 Pickup (did not meet reserve): https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...er-2r5-pickup/
- 52 Commander Convertible (did not meet reserve- Estimated $90-$100K!): https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-36...r-convertible/
Wonder what this 1948 Packard Woody went for. Original survivor car!
- 48 Packard Woody: https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...d-woody-wagon/-Matt
1963 GT Hawk
1960 Metropolitan Convertible
1972 AMC Javelin/ AMX
1956 Cushman Eagle
-
Originally posted by Metman View PostThanks! I only caught part of the broadcast and missed that.
Nice looking car: https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...-turismo-hawk/
Found these on the Mecum site, also from the auction yesterday. It does not show what the sold cars went for.
- 52 Commander: https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...-state-series/ Sold $17,600
- 51 2R5 Pickup (did not meet reserve): https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...er-2r5-pickup/ Unsold $22,000
- 52 Commander Convertible (did not meet reserve- Estimated $90-$100K!): https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-36...r-convertible/ Unsold $52,000
Wonder what this 1948 Packard Woody went for. Original survivor car!
- 48 Packard Woody: https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1118-33...d-woody-wagon/ Unsold $50,000
Comment
-
I watched a 1960 Hawk cross the block on Thursday (I believe) and they made a point of saying the 289 was NOT a Ford engine. They also said that Studebaker built high quality vehicles with great styling. Then, to top it off they said they thought Studebaker Hawks (specifically) were way under valued in the current market.
I think they may have been getting feedback from Studebaker people from past inaccurate statements. They are slowly getting their facts right.Ed Sallia
Dundee, OR
Sol Lucet Omnibus
Comment
Comment