Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Supreme Court upholds RIGHT TO REPAIR
Collapse
X
-
It's a start, but it's gonna be a long fight. As pointed out in the attached article, some companies are now adding language to deny you the right to repair/modify their product. And as many folks don't take the time to read the fine print, or understand all the "lawyer speak", it comes back to bite them in the butt down the road.Money may not buy happiness, but it's more comfortable to cry in a Mercedes than on a bicycle.
Comment
-
Bully for the Supremes! I agree totally once they sell the cartridge we can do whatever we wish with it.
I have a Brothers fax, copy, scanner and printer. If I buy cartridges from them it costs like about 90 dollars and they last about a week or two before it says I am out of one of the colors....WTF?
I found a place online which refills the cartridges and sells them for $60....and they last nearly forever. Wooo hoooo!Diesel loving, autocrossing, Coupe express loving, Grandpa Architect.
Comment
-
The article mentions the John Deere lawsuit.... Can you imagine telling farmers they can't repair their broken machinery in the field? Bad juju to say the least. Same with Lawn Boy..... We'll see what the future brings.The only difference between death and taxes is that death does not grow worse every time Congress convenes. - Will Rogers
Comment
-
Anything I have purchased, I have always reserved the right to repair (or break) with zero thought to who made it...and especially no thought to what the supreme court (or any court) has to say about it. However, this is an extremely important case, if the theory can be extrapolated out to other things regarding individual rights. How about all the restrictions of "computer" goods, software, and services you are required to "agree" to before you can use what you purchased? Buried down into the "legalese" are overly broad scope of "rights" related terms in favor of the providers, that an average layman could spend a lifetime pouring over and never reach a reasonable understanding.
That may very well be the next huge "rights" battle. How many of us, generally, click on the "agree" button when installing, subscribing, or using computer service, and never take the time to read what you are really agreeing to? I have tried to read, and understand, some of this stuff, but never truly understood much of it.
Life is too short. It's like being required to understand where each thorn is in a briar patch before wading in to pick blackberries. Even if you did, you would spend more hours doing that than actually acquiring the berries, still leave sweaty, with thorn pricks, and a itchy painful case of chiggers. So, you might as well click "agree"...wade in, get the berries, and move on.
It's just a simple fact of living, that while our constitution presents "inalienable rights," the nit pickers and hair hairsplitters will forever argue, over the meaning of "inalienable," in an attempt to gain a favorable advantage.John Clary
Greer, SC
SDC member since 1975
Comment
-
Originally posted by t walgamuth View Post
I have a Brothers fax, copy, scanner and printer. If I buy cartridges from them it costs like about 90 dollars and they last about a week or two before it says I am out of one of the colors....WTF?
I found a place online which refills the cartridges and sells them for $60....and they last nearly forever. Wooo hoooo!
A set of all four cartridges from these folks is $15. They are new, not refills
I've been using them for years. I don't print more than a few pages a week. At that rate they last more than a year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Pile View PostThe article mentions the John Deere lawsuit.... Can you imagine telling farmers they can't repair their broken machinery in the field? Bad juju to say the least. Same with Lawn Boy..... We'll see what the future brings.John
1950 Champion
W-3 4 Dr. Sedan
Holdrege NE
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lothar View PostChris, don't underestimate the audacity of John Deere. They REMOTELY shut down a local farmer's combine while it was in the field because he hadn't kept up on the payments. I'm surprised automakers haven't latched on to that idea.
Comment
Comment